73°
Cloudy
WED
 79°
 62°
THU
 76°
 56°
FRI
 82°
 54°
SAT
 79°
 55°
SUN
 79°
 54°

PD Editorial: State-funded recounts in close races

In the wake of an extraordinarily tight primary race for state controller, the Legislature should give priority to reforming outdated election recount laws.

Financial demands on candidates — themselves already at worrisome heights — should not extend to personally paying for recounts in close elections. Voters, meanwhile, will find no solace in paying candidates choosing which areas are recounted. Down that road lies cherry-picked outcomes.

Yet that’s what California law now stipulates, unfairly favoring wealthy candidates who can afford the potential million-dollar-plus price tag for a statewide recount.

The June 3 primary for state controller left the second- and third-place finishers separated by just 481 votes, or 0.01 percent of 4 million votes cast. Second place matters, of course, under the top-two primary system.

Without a provision allowing taxpayer-funded recounts for truly close races, Democrat John A. Pérez, a former Assembly speaker, requested a recount in select areas. He abandoned it after gaining just 10 votes at a price of $30,000. He had hoped to secure the second spot by booting Betty Yee, a fellow Democrat and member of the state Board of Equalization. Fresno Mayor Ashley Swearengin, a Republican, finished first.

Pérez’s targeted recount plan prompted howls of protest from Yee. Under current law, she could have requested and paid for recounts in areas favorable to her. But voters gain little from that sort of pay-to-play face-off. Had the recount continued into late summer, it might have interfered with preparations for the Nov. 4 general election.

This recount process reeks of unfairness. California, often a leader in reforms, is late to this issue.

Twenty states and the District of Columbia offer automatic recounts when the margin of victory is within a narrow percentage or set number of votes.

Everyone benefits when election results are transparently and accurately reviewed, and it’s only reasonable to have everyone, meaning taxpayers, foot the bill.

Assemblyman Kevin Mullin, a San Mateo Democrat, wants the state to adopt an automatic state-funded recount in any statewide contest where the margin is one-tenth of 1 percent or less. Assembly Bill 2194 includes an urgency clause and could take effect in time for the November 4 election.


comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View