s
s
Sections
Search
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?
iPhone

ALAMEDA — On the heels of the blockbuster/fire-sale trades by the Cleveland Cavaliers last week, I thought I’d come up with a surefire Warriors column. Since the Cavs traded nearly half their roster, I was going to point out that the Dubs rarely make major midseason trades.

And that would lead me to opine that a big part of the reason is that they have searched out less-touted “building block” players, like Shaun Livingston and David West (one of the few bright spots against OKC). Other teams end up making midseason deals to fill roster holes because they can’t find and sign these incredibly rare and valuable role players.

I pitched it to head coach Steve Kerr, who listened thoughtfully, then dumped a bucket of cold water on the idea.

“There’s a million guys out there that can play a role,” he said. “We’ve got All-Stars.”

OK. Point taken.

But again, now that the trade deadline has come and gone, Warriors fans may recall that the last big deal during the season was Andrew Bogut back in 2012.

And says general manager Bob Myers, that’s no accident.

(FYI: Myers is a law school graduate, passer of the bar exam and is the first GM I have ever spoken to who used the word “disparate” in a sentence … correctly … I think. And to be clear, I talked to Myers before the Cleveland swap-athon took place.)

“Trades are the hardest way to construct a team,” he said. “The trade deadline is probably the most challenging time because you find yourself the most desperate. Unfortunately, it is the hardest time of the year to expect a good result.”

Now, Myers wanted to make it clear he wasn’t talking about any specific team, like Cleveland, but that’s fine. We can make the point ourselves.

Cleveland is the classic plug-and-play squad. Whatever you say Lebron James’ role is with the team — I’d go with assistant general manager at the very least — it seems pretty obvious that each year, during the season, he takes the team’s temperature, and if things are not going well, will agitate for change.

This deal — dumping Isiah Thomas, Dwyane Wade and four others — is extreme, but it fits the Cavs’ pattern.

In 2015, after James complained they had no outside shooting, the Cavs made a midseason trade for J.R. Smith. And when that didn’t solve things, James approved a January 2017 deal for Kyle Korver. James also applauded the Kevin Love deal and publicly lobbied for the trade for Wade. (He then gave Wade a fond farewell when he was shipped out.)

And how did all that work out? Cleveland was a finger-pointing hot mess. They were not just bickering; they were losing. Every day there was another news story about the unhappiness of King James.

Trade-for-success was a workable plan for the Cavaliers for a while. But when those veteran trade targets get older, they run into diminishing returns.

Teams are still doing it, of course. Oklahoma City, with the addition of Paul George (and the whatever of Carmelo Anthony), outmuscled the Warriors impressively last week. Houston is proving us wrong with Chris Paul turning out to be a good partner for James Harden.

But the irony is that the league is trying to put together a “Super-Team” when that’s not how the Warriors were built. Steph Curry, Klay Thompson and Draymond Green were products of draft classes.

It seems each year someone does a comparison between the rosters of the Warriors and Cavaliers. Last year the Cavs had just two players on their roster from the draft. The Warriors had five, including the big three.

“We set out to build the best team we could,” Myers said. “The phraseology ‘Super-Team’ was never written on a whiteboard.”

Well sure, Bob, but you have to admit this Kevin Durant fellow is turning out to be a nice little trade pickup.

“A lot of people point to the Durant moment,” Myers admitted. “But it is not one person. It really is Steph becoming what he did. And Klay. Draymond. It’s Steve Kerr and people wanting to play for him. It’s our fans. Our ownership. It’s incremental.”

Still, it is tantalizing for a promising team to think that if it could just add that one extra piece, they could make a run.

It’s hard not to pull the trigger. Consider: Bogut’s stats weren’t impressive, but he turned the Warriors’ defense around.

“In a sport where contracts are shorter, patience is shorter,” Myers said. “Results need to be right now. We’re finding a very impatient league, which leads to more mobility. More change.”

Which leads the Warriors, Myers says, to lean toward keeping the team intact to emphasize familiarity. Hold the core group together and then beat the bushes to find those overlooked, but valuable, role players.

Which — wait a minute — sounds a bit like my original premise. I even told Kerr I thought Myers had kind of validated my theory.

He gave me the raised eyebrow. Unimpressed.

“All I know is I wasn’t a very good player,” he said. “But I was a heck of a lot better player when I was on a good team than when I was on a bad one.”

OK, so talent counts. Noted.

Contact C.W. Nevius at cw.nevius@pressdemocrat.com. Twitter: @cwnevius.

Show Comment