Why elite athletes turn into couch potatoes Why elite athletes turn into couch potatoes
Question: Twenty years from now, who’s more likely to be a regular, healthy exerciser? A) The all-American athlete, with the ripped physique, seemingly infinite endurance, superhuman strength and supremely tuned agility? Or B) The decidedly less-impressive specimen sitting in the bleachers?
Intuition suggests A. Since athletes know how to exercise, love exercise and have been doing it all their lives, maintaining healthy exercise habits should be easy, right? Except, well, it’s not.
In a series of studies, the first of which was published in the journal Sports Health, my colleagues and I examined the health and exercise habits of nearly 500 students and alumni from the University of Southern California. They included current and former student-athletes - some of whom competed at the Olympics or went on to be pros - as well as nonathletes who never played college sports.
Predictably, current student athletes reported being more active, averaging 15 hours of weekly exercise, 11 more than students who didn’t play sports. Three out of four said exercise was “very important” in their lives (compared with just one in six nonathletes). And 86 percent met healthy exercise guidelines: 150 minutes of cardio and two sessions of strength training per week. Student athletes were 30 times as likely as nonathlete students to do so.
But among alumni, who on average competed in the 1980s and 1990s, being a former college athlete had nothing to do with being a healthy exerciser. Both athlete and nonathlete alums reported an average of five hours a week of exercise - most of that cardio. Just 40 percent met the healthy exercise guidelines. That’s admittedly twice the national average, suggesting that USC alumni as a whole are relatively active. The surprise, though, was that the former jocks were just as likely to become couch potatoes.
It wasn’t always this way. At least two earlier studies - one tracking Finnish athletes who’d competed for some period between 1920 and 1965, and the other looking at NFL players who’d been part of the league during the 1958 season - found former athletes more likely to exercise throughout their lives and to enjoy health benefits as a result.
So what’s changed? In recent decades, athletic training has become more specialized, structured and supervised. Gone are the days when Sir Roger Bannister (the first to run a sub-four-minute mile) sneaked in training as a medical school hobby.
Once it was common for fall’s football stars to dabble in baseball in the spring - or take the offseason off. For modern athletes, competitive sports are an integral part of life, a major year-round commitment, an opportunity for financial or professional rewards, and an important source of social and psychological identity.
“There’s a routine and a lifestyle that you’ve built around this sport when you’ve been involved with it since elementary school,” says Jennifer Lushao, a former Rice University swimmer. “It just kind of dominates your life physically, mentally and emotionally.”
You might assume that after all that training, lingering injuries could get in the way of exercise later in life. And certainly, for some athletes, they do. But that didn’t explain the former athletes in our study. We found no association between joint health and exercise patterns, and health-related quality of life was similar for athlete and nonathlete alums. Something else is going on.
From a young age, modern athletes become accustomed to executing a carefully planned training regimen under constant guidance and oversight. They are supported by an ever-growing infrastructure of coaches, trainers and support staff. College athletes might have a head coach, position coach, strength and conditioning coach, athletic trainer, physical therapist, dietician, sports psychologist and academic counselor assigned to them.
“Everything is totally planned out for you - class scheduling, practice hours, tutoring,” says Amanda Smith, a former USC swimmer. “I am the kind of person who thrived as an athlete because I did great with structure.”
When that structure disappears at the end of an athletic career, the freedom can be liberating. “You literally go overnight from being required to be somewhere doing strenuous, structured physical activity over 20 hours a week to having absolutely no obligations to do anything physical whatsoever,” Lushao says. “The freedom was really mind-blowing .”
Yet many athletes have trouble making the transition to a world in which they return home from work tired, stressed and not at all thrilled by the prospect of trekking alone to the gym to do exercise that’s “good for you.”
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: