Sonoma State President Sakaki faces even steeper uphill battle after Sens. Dodd, McGuire ask her to step down
Even as Sonoma State University President Judy Sakaki was calling for a time of healing in the immediate aftermath of a faculty no-confidence vote against her Monday, she lost the support of two men who should be her biggest political allies.
State Sens. Mike McGuire, D-Healdsburg, and Bill Dodd, D-Napa, called on her to step down immediately after the vote, in which 62% of the faculty members who participated said they no longer had faith in Sakaki.
Faculty no-confidence votes are not uncommon in academia and often illustrate the historic cultural rift between university administrators and professors.
However, the loss of support from McGuire and Dodd could cripple her ability to overcome what has become the most tumultuous period of her career, a period that started with revelations that the university had paid a $600,000 settlement to a former provost who had reported complaints of sexual harassment against Sakaki’s husband.
The news of the settlement was first reported by The Press Democrat on April 13.
For full coverage of the SSU investigation, click here.
Dodd and McGuire — both California State University alumni — say their main priority is the academic future of the nearly half million students at Sonoma State and the other 22 CSU campuses that comprise the nation’s largest and most diverse four-year university system.
“This is not personal,” said Dodd, a Chico State graduate. “This is totally professional, analyzing the situation and her ability to do the best job that those students and faculty members deserve to have done — and alumni and donors deserve to have done — at the school. I just don’t think she can do it.”
McGuire, who graduated from Sonoma State in 2002 and was recognized by the school as a distinguished alumnus in 2015, said it’s time for a culture change at his alma mater and the rest of the CSU system.
“The university needs the opportunity to refocus on what’s important, that’s the mission, its mission to educate students,” McGuire said.
He added the scandal involving Sakaki’s now-estranged husband, lobbyist Patrick McCallum, is a “huge distraction” that’s hobbling the university.
The hiring and firing of a CSU president, he said, is ultimately the decision of the CSU chancellor and Board of Trustees. “But I felt it was important, especially as an alumnus, to speak up,” McGuire said. “And I firmly believe that this fall, students should come back to a university that’s free of controversy.”
Sakaki declined a request for an in-person or phone interview. Larry Kamer, a spokesperson for Sakaki, also declined comment.
“We’ve already said what we’re going to say about senators Dodd and McGuire,” he said.
For his part, Dodd said Sakaki faces insurmountable damage for her handling of sexual harassment allegations against her husband, which came as the university faces a crippling budget deficit of $15.5 million to $17 million and a 24% decline in enrollment.
McGuire acknowledged the virtues of forgiveness, but he made it clear he thought Sonoma State would be better off moving forward without Sakaki at the helm.
These are strong words coming from state lawmakers whose local support is ideal, if not crucial, given the state Legislature controls the CSU system’s purse strings.
McGuire, the Senate majority leader, sits on the education committee, and Gov. Gavin Newsom, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis and Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon are ex officio CSU trustees.
CSU leadership in Long Beach is paying attention to recent developments at Sonoma State.
“A vote of no-confidence by the faculty, statements made by our elected officials, as well as the totality of a president’s achievements, are collectively and thoughtfully considered when the Trustees or the Chancellor evaluate the effectiveness of campus leadership,” CSU spokesperson Michael Uhlenkamp said this week.
Dave McCuan, chair of Sonoma State’s Political Science department, said he believes the senators’ call for Sakaki to step down will cripple Sakaki’s credibility when it comes to making the fiscal case for such things as one-time funding for infrastructure work.
That one-time funding for capital projects, upgrades and deferred maintenance previously went through the CSU Board of Trustees, said Uhlenkamp. But this year, CSU presidents and administrators seeking such funds are being asked to hit up their legislative representatives.
“Given California’s current unique fiscal situation with the state boasting its largest-ever surplus of funds, campuses have been advised to work with their local delegations to seek one-time funding in support of individual infrastructure projects that had been previously approved by the Board of Trustees,” Uhlenkamp said in an email.
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: