Subscribe

Yes on Prop 3: Protecting water supplies

Of the 11 propositions on the Nov. 6 ballot, we found Proposition 3, an $8.9 billion water bond, to be the closest call. California has no shortage of water needs, but voters approved a $4 billion parks, environment and water bond in June.

The case against Proposition 3: Unlike the June bond, which was placed on the ballot by the Legislature, this measure is a product of the initiative process. It was drafted and bankrolled by organizations that stand to benefit from its approval.

The case for Proposition 3: California's severe drought exposed widespread problems with the state's water supply that can only be fixed with investments in watershed protection, conservation, groundwater recharge and infrastructure repairs.

What tips the balance? Much of the money will be distributed as grants by state agencies, and Sonoma County Water Agency officials anticipate funding from several categories, including wastewater recycling, urban and agricultural water conservation, flood control and storm water management. Small water systems throughout the region also could qualify for funding.

It's a close call, but with the expectation of funding for local water projects, we say thumbs up to Proposition 3.

You can send a letter to the editor at letters@pressdemocrat.com

UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy:

  • This is a family newspaper, please use a kind and respectful tone.
  • No profanity, hate speech or personal attacks. No off-topic remarks.
  • No disinformation about current events.
  • We will remove any comments — or commenters — that do not follow this commenting policy.
Send a letter to the editor

Our Network

Sonoma Index-Tribune
Petaluma Argus Courier
North Bay Business Journal
Sonoma Magazine
Bite Club Eats
La Prensa Sonoma
Emerald Report
Spirited Magazine