Watch out Wine Country, Weed Country is catching up
Annual Sonoma County crop reports over the past decades have chronicled one primary story: The rise of the wine grape as our most prized crop.
The fruit overtook milk production in 1987 and has since increased in cash value by 607% to $540 million in value in 2021.
Over the years, the reports have told many other tales, such as the demise of once-coveted crops — namely, prunes and pears — and the persistence of apples from its heyday of the beloved Gravenstein to a niche crop now surviving in its use in hard cider and apple cider vinegar.
Agriculture, after all, is always evolving and changing — including the rise locally of plant-based food manufacturing. That was especially the case over the past year.
In 2021, cannabis was included as part of the tally for the first time in the report and it showed a remarkable $123 million in cash value ― not including hemp, which is legal under federal law. The figure included about $1.6 million in such nursery products as seedlings and plants.
That makes marijuana the third most valuable crop in Sonoma County. Weed was barely edged out by milk production for second place by a difference of less than $2 million.
“It’s a milestone,” said Erich Pearson, founder and chief executive officer of Sparc, which operates a biodynamic cannabis farm in Glen Ellen and oversees 5 acres in Sonoma County.
“Sonoma County needs to diversify. Grapes are not the end-all anymore,” added Pearson. His company also has a manufacturing facility in Santa Rosa and retail outlets in San Francisco, Sebastopol, Sonoma and Santa Rosa.
The report comes as cannabis growers and their allies said they still feel stigmatized in their treatment compared to other farmers and ranchers even after the 2016 passage of Proposition 64, which legalized adult cannabis use in the state.
Most notably, the county is rewriting its problematic cultivation ordinance in a debate that has pitted the industry against some rural residents who don’t want such activity in their neighborhoods. And unlike other crops, marijuana farmers are taxed after harvest, bringing in $1.1 million in revenue for the county last year.
“I think there is still a lot of stigma with cannabis even here in California and even here in Sonoma County. This (report) will help normalize that,” said Lauren Mendelsohn. She’s a Sebastopol attorney who works with local growers and is a board member of California NORML, acronym for the cannabis advocacy group National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.
In fact, the inclusion of cannabis was an addendum to the report that was compiled by the county’s Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Commissioner Andrew Smith told the board of supervisors on Oct. 4 he will include hemp in the full 2022 report and its specific cash value.
Hemp has been legalized at the federal level as a result of the 2018 farm bill, which removed it from the definition of marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act. Sonoma County has 24 acres of hemp, a plant that does not have enough compounds to trigger psychoactive symptoms.
The main issue continues to be that cannabis is listed as a Schedule 1 drug at the federal level, which means the federal government has determined it has no medical use and a high risk for abuse.
President Joe Biden announced last month a review that may reclassify it as a lower risk, which would open up more business possibilities and less regulatory burdens.
The Sonoma County Farm Bureau doesn’t have any cannabis growers on its board of directors, said Dayna Ghirardelli, executive director, citing that cannabis is still illegal at the federal level.
“If it changes at the federal level, that changes the conversation,” Ghirardelli said.
While the debate continues at all levels of government, the report did shed a notable spotlight on what cannabis growers contend is one of their strongest arguments: They don’t need a lot of land to grow their legal weed.
There were almost 50 acres of licensed cannabis farms in Sonoma County, which provided a value of $2.45 million per acre on last year’s crop where marijuana was priced at $570 per pound. All but 3 acres were outdoor cultivation.
In contrast, there were 58,761 acres for wine grapes, which provided a $9,220 per acre value.
Supervisor Susan Gorin, who represents the Sonoma Valley, told Smith during his appearance in front of the board she appreciated the inclusion of cannabis and specifically noted the report shows that the crop has a very light footprint.
“It is a good barometer to start recording that. And it’s important for our neighbors who are concerned about where cannabis is cultivated, to point this out that it really occupies a very few acres in our county,” Gorin said.
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: