Settlement OK'd ending lawsuit over Russian River gravel mining

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.


Two environmental groups have agreed to drop their lawsuit challenging a large, planned gravel mine in the Russian River in exchange for some near-term reductions in the level of instream mining and more input on annual operations.

The settlement was announced Tuesday following its approval by the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors. It will allow Syar Industries of Napa to go forward with its project, which would remove gravel along a 6.5-mile stretch of river in the lower Alexander Valley outside of Geyserville.

Syar officials welcomed the deal in a joint statement released with the two environmental groups behind the lawsuit, Russian Riverkeeper of Healdsburg and the Redwood Empire chapter of Trout Unlimited.

"We are pleased that we were able to resolve concerns rather than spend more time litigating," John Perry, Syar's vice president of engineering, said in the statement.

The Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the project in December 2010.

But river advocates argued the level of mining proposed — up to 350,000 tons of gravel annually for 15 years — would harm the river, its beleaguered salmon and steelhead populations and riverside landowners. Safeguards to prevent such impacts were inadequately addressed in the county's environmental review, the two conservation groups claimed in their lawsuit, filed in January 2011.

The groups had pressed for a new environmental review, and for the project's approval to be set aside and any pending or current work halted.

Under the settlement, the lawsuit will be dropped provided Syar and the county meet a number of measures. Those include a three-year reduction in the gravel to be mined from river bars, to a maximum of 175,000 tons a year, with an additional 40,000 tons per year linked to work strictly on habitat improvements; more detailed annual monitoring and county oversight that allows for input by river advocates and landowners; and the mutual formation of a scientific review team to guide ongoing decisions about the mining project. Syar has agreed to pay the environmental groups $30,000 to hire their own consultants to participate on the scientific team.

The deal resulted from more than a year and a half of negotiations that Don McEnhill, executive director of Russian Riverkeeper, described as "very difficult and often contentious." He credited Syar officials and county representatives for their willingness to forge what he called "tighter more transparent oversight" of the project.

"As the mining occurs, we're hopeful going forward that with this settlement we'll be able to protect the Russian River and the native fish and wildlife that rely on it," McEnhill said, echoing his written statement.

The Syar project was one of three disputed land-use projects approved by the Board of Supervisors in late 2010. The other two, which were approved on 3-2 votes, were the Roblar Road rock quarry west of Cotati and the Dutra Materials asphalt plant south of Petaluma. They also prompted legal challenges from opponents concerned about environmental impacts.

The lawsuit against the Dutra plant is before a state appellate court. The Roblar quarry case is also headed to the appellate level, following a local judge's ruling in August that sided with quarry opponents on several core claims.

As part of its original application with the county, Syar agreed to pay county costs stemming from a legal dispute. County Counsel Bruce Goldstein did not have that figure immediately available Tuesday.

You can reach Staff Writer Brett Wilkison at 521-5295 or

Please read our commenting policy
  • No profanity, abuse, racism or hate speech
  • No personal attacks on other commenters
  • No spam or off-topic posts
  • Comments including URLs and media may be held for moderation
Send a letter to the editor
*** The system is currently unable to accept new posts (we're working on it) ***

Our Network

Sonoma Index-Tribune
Petaluma Argus Courier
North Bay Business Journal
Sonoma Magazine
Bite Club Eats
La Prensa Sonoma
Emerald Report
Spirited Magazine