North Bay cities are getting their first look at Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit station designs, and officials are largely underwhelmed with what they have seen. With little fanfare, SMART this spring released the spare designs that include a bench, a shelter and some lamps atop a platform.
City councils in Rohnert Park, Novato and San Rafael this month held public hearings on the preliminary designs, produced by infrastructure company AECOM. Some city officials say the platforms are more akin to a bus stop than the sort of classic rail station design that residents envisioned during community input sessions four years ago.
“This is something that is very important,” Rohnert Park Mayor Joe Callinan said during the city’s station review two weeks ago. “What I’m all for is getting the best damn train station for Rohnert Park, not just some cookie-cutter thing just because of (SMART’s) budget. Just because we want the SMART train, I don’t want to compromise any of our standards. I want a good-looking SMART station, and I want it done right.”
SMART says with the money that it has, it is building functional platforms, comparable to other regional rail networks.
The expectations raised during better financial times must now be tempered with a dose of economic reality, agency officials say. Cities, private groups, even corporations may be able to chip in to enhance the commuter rail stations with amenities like restrooms, coffee stands and public art.
Jake Mackenzie, a Rohnert Park city councilman and SMART board member, said the rail authority never intended to build elaborate stations.
“This is not the romance of the Orient Express,” he said. “The perceptions of the public are altered by watching Downton Abbey and all sorts of things. They go into London and they see Euston Station. They go into Berlin and they see the Hauptbahnhof . . . . Platforms, yes. Train stations, no. They were never promised.”
Some cities, like Santa Rosa and Petaluma, have old train depots — relics of a bygone era when passenger rail dominated the transportation landscape. In those cities, the SMART platform designs seem to be generating less controversy. Still, city officials said, the platforms should complement the existing depots.
“We’ve already got a pretty interesting depot,” Santa Rosa Mayor Scott Bartley said of the 110-year-old Railroad Square building, now in use as a California Welcome Center. “As long as the SMART platforms do not detract from it, I don’t know what more we can do to improve it.”
Petaluma Mayor David Glass echoed those comments in speaking about his city’s renovated rail depot, which currently houses the Petaluma Visitor’s Bureau and Petaluma Arts Center.
“I don’t know why we need much of anything. We have a historic building,” he said. “I hope SMART respects our historic nature. What is most valuable, for me, is the opportunity to have public comment.”
Some cities, like Cloverdale, Windsor and Cotati, have built contemporary station buildings with the intent of integrating them into SMART’s platforms. David Rabbitt, a Sonoma County supervisor and SMART board member, said cities are free to add their own station building at their expense.
“To me, there’s a big difference between a platform design and a station design. We call them stations, but in reality, what (SMART is) really designing are the platforms themselves,” Rabbitt said. “Hopefully we can have vibrant stations with a platform that’s going to be utilitarian and that’s going to get people on and off the train in a safe manner.”