Mendocino County pot panel proposal falls short on signatures

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.


A controversial proposed Mendocino County ballot initiative that sought to give authority over marijuana regulation to an appointed commission won’t make it onto the November ballot.

Proponents of the initiative collected an estimated 2,797 signatures by Monday, their submissions deadline with the Mendocino County elections office. The proposal needed at least 5,004 valid signatures from registered Mendocino County voters to be eligible for the ballot.

Proponents have said they planned to ask county supervisors to directly place the initiative on the ballot instead. Most supervisors have expressed strong opposition to the proposal, in part because it appeared to hand the appointed commission far-reaching authority. Supervisors said such authority should only come with elected office.

The initiative would have created a 13-member “Mendocino Cannabis Commission” dominated by people in the marijuana industry. Proponents said it would just advise the board on regulation and taxation policies for cannabis. But the initiative stated that the commission, “is hereby established and empowered to oversee and promulgate cannabis policy, standards, principles, regional heritage appellations, regulations and enforcement mechanisms.” It also exempted from taxation family farmers and growers grossing less than $250,000 from pot sales.

The Board of Supervisors would have been “required to uphold the values, beliefs and rights enumerated” in the initiative.

You can reach Staff Writer Glenda Anderson at 462-6473 or On Twitter @MendoReporter.

Show Comment

Our Network

Sonoma Index-Tribune
Petaluma Argus Courier
North Bay Business Journal
Sonoma Magazine
Bite Club Eats
La Prensa Sonoma
Emerald Report
Spirited Magazine