Santa Rosa City Council race taken by newcomers Jack Tibbetts and Chris Rogers, incumbents Julie Combs and Ernesto Olivares

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.


Check local election results here

Santa Rosa voters returned two incumbents to the City Council and chose two relative political newcomers whose support for rent control means the controversial new law ­— currently suspended by a referendum petition — will continue to enjoy council support.

In final returns, Jack Tibbetts, a member of the Board of Public Utilities and top fundraiser in the race, led with 21 percent the vote. He was followed closely by incumbent Julie Combs, a champion of rent control and now the only female member of the council, with 20 percent.

Newcomer Chris Rogers, a former aide to state Sen. Mike McGuire and rent control supporter, and two-term incumbent Ernesto Olivares, a rent control foe, rounded out the field, with 18 and 17.5 percent, respectively, after all 74 precincts had been counted. But a change seemed unlikely from mail-in ballots given the wide gap between the top four vote getters and the two runners-up, Don Taylor and Brandi Asker.

Taylor, who owns Omelette Express and has previously run for council unsuccessfully four times, received about 13 percent of the vote. And Asker, a regional manager at Starbucks in her first run for public office, received 11 percent.

Tibbetts, who celebrated with friends and supporters at his Bennett Valley home, said the apparent results were heartening.

“I’m very excited about the opportunity to be able to serve the people of this city,” Tibbetts said.

Tibbetts raised the most of any candidate, $76,000, from hundreds of supporters who were capped by local campaign limits at $500 each.

But a single donor, listed as Scott Flater, the son-in-law of influential local developer and banker Bill Gallaher, spent nearly $192,000 on mailers and canvassing in support of three candidates. Almost half, or nearly $94,000, was spent in support of Tibbetts.

He said the next council will have to grapple with the wide gulf between local spending limits and the unlimited amounts allowed by independent expenditure committees. He noted, however, that the candidate who benefited most from IE committees, Taylor, had little to show for it. “I think the takeaway is nothing beats shoe-leather,” Tibbetts said.

Rogers struck a similar theme, noting that his volunteers knocked on 20,000 doors in the city as they focused on having real conversations with voters about their concerns.

“We knew with this amount of money coming in, the only way we were going to win was by actually engaging our actual neighbors in a dialogue,” Rogers said.

Council members serve four-year terms on the seven-member council, with elections for three or four seats alternating every other year, making this year one of significant change.

The decision by two incumbents — Gary Wysocky and Erin Carlstrom — not to seek reelection ensured the council would see at least two fresh faces this year, potentially putting controversial city policies like rent control back in play.

But the election of Tibbetts and Rogers largely ensures that the council won’t reverse itself on rent control. Taylor, who was heavily backed by landlords, threatened to do just that.

Both Tibbetts and Rogers have said they would have voted in favor of rent control, given the severity of the local housing crisis — which has seen rents soar 30 percent in three years. However, each said they would have worked to make it more effective.

Check local election results here

The city’s rent control and just-cause for eviction law passed in late August still face a referendum challenge.

The registrar of voters has said a hand-count of the petition won’t be completed until Dec. 22. If the 8,485 signatures are verified, then the new council would be given two options: repeal rent control or call a special election on it. That choice will likely be made in early January.

The election appears to be going down as the most expensive in the city’s history. More than $525,000 was raised by candidates and independent expenditure committees on a job that pays $9,600 per year.

Tibbetts, Taylor and Olivares all benefited from vast amounts of cash flowing into the race, more than the candidates raised themselves.

Olivares raised $34,000 in his own campaign, but benefited from nearly $50,000 spent on his behalf by Flater, according to filings.

Taylor raised the least of any of the competitive candidates for his own campaign, $33,000. But thanks to $52,000 raised by Flater and $80,500 from a committee backed by real estate and landlord groups, the total raised to support him swelled to $165,500.

But in the end, Taylor didn’t receive many more votes than Asker, who raised just $8,425.

Voters also appeared to approve by wide margins two ballot measures aimed at ensuring the city’s long-term financial health.

Measure N passed with 72 percent of the vote, extending for another eight years the quarter-cent sales tax meant to support general city services.

And Measure O passed with about 72 percent in support, tweaking the baseline funding calculation of the existing quarter-cent public safety sales tax passed in 2004.

Measure N is the reincarnation of Measure P, which was passed in 2010 to help the city weather the recession. Now that the economy and city budget have rebounded, the measure was “retooled” to support other pressing city needs, such as housing and homelessness, said Tim Aboudara, principal officer of ONward Santa Rosa, the committee supporting the measures.

ONward Santa Rosa raised $23,000, mostly from city unions, for mailers supporting both measures. The police union, however, was notably absent from the list of funders.

Instead of pegging the annual increases in baseline funding levels to inflation, the baseline will be set to the 2015 budget year.

You can reach Staff Writer Kevin McCallum at 521-5207 or On Twitter @SRCityBeat.

Please read our commenting policy
  • No profanity, abuse, racism, hate speech or personal attacks on others.
  • No spam or off-topic posts. Keep the conversation to the theme of the article.
  • No disinformation about current events. Make sure facts are from a reliable source.
  • No name calling. "Orange Menace", "Libtards", etc. are not respectful.
Send a letter to the editor

Our Network

Sonoma Index-Tribune
Petaluma Argus Courier
North Bay Business Journal
Sonoma Magazine
Bite Club Eats
La Prensa Sonoma
Emerald Report
Spirited Magazine