Study targets toxic exposure in firefighters after North Bay fires
About 85 Sonoma County firefighters will undergo limited health screenings for a study of first responders’ exposure to toxins during last month’s destructive fires, which produced noxious, throat-burning smoke that darkened North Bay skies for days.
Blood and urine samples are to be collected from a total of 175 firefighters from across the wider Bay Area who battled the wildfires in Sonoma County and neighboring communities.
The hastily organized research project is being funded by the 10-year-old San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation, which committed $100,000 to the cause, board member and San Francisco firefighter Adam Wood said.
Twenty-five firefighters who were not dispatched to the fires will be tested for the purpose of comparison, organizers said.
Researchers will be looking for evidence of heavy metals, like arsenic and chromium, organic pollutants, such as dioxins, and other toxic byproducts of burning materials, according to UC Berkeley Environmental Science Professor Rachel Morello-Frosch, who is leading the research.
Firefighters already are at significantly greater risk than the general public of developing certain cancers, according to health experts. Studies indicate they may absorb carcinogens and other toxins through their skin and clothes and hand-to-mouth ingestion, in addition to breathing smoke.
“Firefighters are on the front lines of these major wildfire events, and the exposure they experience is going to be unusually high,” Morello-Frosch said. “But they’re kind of, in many ways, the canary in the coal mine of what the health implications are of these kinds of intense chemical exposures associated with major extreme fire events.”
‘West Coast 9/11’
The scale and intensity of the October infernos has heightened health concerns, particularly for crews who responded in the first wave of the emergency and stayed for days and weeks, eating and sleeping in their turnouts, often on the fireline.
“From a firefighter long-term health standpoint, this is the West Coast 9/11,” said Santa Rosa firefighter Tim Aboudara, president of the city firefighters’ union, referring to a wave of health issues among those who responded to the 2001 World Trade Center bombing.
“That’s not me saying that. That’s health people talking about it.”
The catastrophic firestorm included four wildfires now listed among the 20 most destructive fires in California history, including the top-ranking Tubbs fire.
The Nuns fire also is in the top 20, as well as the Atlas fire in Napa County and the Redwood fire in Mendocino County.
More than 6,500 structures, mostly homes, and countless vehicles were destroyed in Sonoma County alone, along with whatever potentially hazardous fuels, chemicals, coatings and materials may have burned along with them.
Moreover, where firefighters normally would wear self-contained breathing apparatuses to fight structure fires, most battled the Wine Country fires in lighter, less restrictive wildland gear, without heavy air tanks and the constraining face masks, mouthpieces and framed harnesses that would have eliminated exposure to toxic fumes, firefighters said.
Thus, they had little to no respiratory protection at all during days of heavy physical exertion in smoke that contained a whole host of chemicals, Aboudara said.
“If we go to a wildland fire and it happens to burn a home, then we are exposed, essentially, to the same kinds of things as we were at this particular fire,” said Fire Chief Jack Piccinini, who heads the Windsor and Rincon Valley Fire Protection districts. “The problem is we were exposed to these kinds of things for days.”