We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.



Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.


Road Repair Projects

Ferguson Road Mile Marker 10–11.31 (Pavement chip seal)

Furlong Road Mile Marker 10-11.73 (Pavement chip seal)

Poplar Avenue Mile Marker 10-11 (Pavement chip seal)

Bohemian Highway Mile Marker 13.93–18.78 (Pavement overlay)

Grove Street Mile Marker 11.79–13.87 (Pavement overlay)

River Road Mile Marker 30.00-34.21 (Pavement overlay)

Willowside Road Mile Marker 10.16-11.17 (Pavement repair)

Wallace Road Mile Marker 10-11.49 (Pavement repair)

River Road Mile Marker 30-34.24 (Ditching)

Los Alamos Road Mile Marker 10.94-14.30 (Ditching)

Bohemian Highway Mile Marker 10-13.60 (Ditching)

Ross Road Mile Marker 10.61-11.86 (Ditching)

Neeley Road Mile Marker 14.92 (Viaduct replacement)

Summerhome Park Road Mile Marker 10.41 (Viaduct replacement)

Porter Creek Road Mile Marker 19.89–20.19 (Pavement grind and patch)

River Road Mile Marker 12.14–12.54 (Pavement grind and patch)

Tomales Road Mile Marker 10-10.30 (Pavement grind and patch)

Arnold Drive Mile Marker 13.30-13.60 (Pavement grind and patch)

Mountain Road Mile Marker 10.54 (Culvert replacement)

Coleman Valley Road Mile Marker 17.57 (Culvert replacement)

Salmon Creek Road Mile Marker 12.29 (Culvert replacement)

Chiquita Road Mile Marker 11.69 (Culvert replacement)

Bonness Road Mile Marker 10.13 (Culvert replacement)

Bonness Road Mile Marker 10.42 (Culvert replacement)

Lytton Station Road Mile Marker 11.14 (Culvert replacement)

Lytton Station Road Mile Marker 11.16 (Culvert replacement)

West Dry Creek Road Mile Marker 14.96 (Culvert replacement)

West Dry Creek Road Mile Marker 10.45 (Culvert replacement)

Windsor Road Mile Marker 11.99 (Culvert replacement)

Windsor Road Mile Marker 12.21 (Culvert replacement)

Irwin Lane Mile Marker 11.19 (Culvert replacement)

Sonoma County will soon spend about $10 million on more than two dozen road improvement projects from funding provided by statewide fees assessed every time commuters pay at the pump.

The proposal covers repaving more than 15 miles of local roadways and 12 miles of ditching work, in addition to replacement of two viaducts and 13 culverts. California’s new gas tax is expected to collect $5.2 billion annually, but depending on the amount collected in its first year, Sonoma County will expand or reduce projects based on its slice of the pie.

The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors approved the plan last week with a 4-0 vote to address deferred maintenance needs, and the Transportation & Public Works department is gearing up to deploy crews this summer.

“It’s unprecedented,” said Johannes Hoevertsz, director of the county’s Transportation & Public Works department. “It’s going to be an awesome influx of funding for road maintenance and road repairs. Long term, we plan on delivering all the projects on that list.”

That list, which the law required be submitted ahead of time for purposes of transparency with the new tax revenues, includes resurfacing 5 miles of the Bohemian Highway and ditching — or re-establishing roadside drainages — another 3½ miles of the west county roadway. A 4-mile stretch of River Road northeast of Santa Rosa will receive similar repairs, and the viaducts at Neeley Road and Summerhome Park Road will be swapped out.

County roads and streets, and other commuter infrastructure typically fall to the bottom of the infrastructural pile when it comes to transportation upgrades because the more heavily trafficked thoroughfares, such as Highway 101, are often in greater need of fixes or construction expansions. Those projects can also qualify for matching funds from state and federal coffers depending on what nearby cities commit, granting additional priority.

“You make sure that you take care of those roads first, and that pushes others down because the funds are always less than the needs,” said Sonoma County Supervisor David Rabbitt, also a member of the Sonoma County Transportation Authority. “These types of programs … allow us to get to roads we’d not get to otherwise. We need to continue to do that and make a commitment to keep growing that fund, to make sure all of our roads and investment in infrastructure is what it should be.”

The maintenance work is made possible by the passage of Senate Bill 1, which Gov. Jerry Brown signed a year ago. On Nov. 1 the base tax on a gallon of gas rose 12 cents to 30 cents per gallon, and the tax on a gallon of diesel increased 20 cents to 36 cents per gallon. Diesel also saw an additional 4 percent tax hike.

A new annual transportation improvement fee between $25 and $175 depending on the value of the vehicle, also went into effect Jan. 1, and will assess individual drivers. Zero-emission vehicles will see a $100 annual fee starting July 1, 2020 as well, and taxes at the pump will continue to rise based on inflation starting that date, too.

Not everyone is enthusiastic about the recent tax increase. Some of California’s congressional Republicans agree it is a primary responsibility of the government to invest in infrastructure, but they say that requires prioritizing existing taxes rather than demanding more from already cash-strapped residents.

An effort by state assemblyman and gubernatorial candidate Travis Allen, R-Huntington Beach, to repeal the gas tax with a ballot measure ended in January when he failed to meet a signature-gathering deadline. A separate repeal campaign led by his gubernatorial rival, businessman John Cox, is still active and expects its anti-gas tax initiative to appear on November’s ballot.

The “Give Voters A Voice” movement must provide 585,407 valid signatures to the Secretary of State by May 21. Campaign consultant Dave Gilliard anticipates submission of the signatures in the next 10 days.

“We’ll be done long before the deadline … and expect to turn in significantly more signatures,” said Gilliard. “We are very confident it will qualify for the November ballot.”

The prospective measure would grant voters a chance to create a constitutional amendment rescinding the taxes from SB1. It would also restrict lawmakers from imposing any future gas-related fees without first going to voters for a majority approval.

Opponents of the repeal effort call it shortsighted and an attempt to get out the vote among conservatives for what some believe could be a tough year for Republican candidates in a handful of contested Central Valley races.

Counties across the state can expect to receive the new funds starting July 1. At full implementation, Sonoma County’s proportion could be as much as $12 million a year to pay for its local road projects.

None of the money in the first year will go toward fixing damage caused by heavy-duty debris trucks during wildfire recovery operations. The total cost of those impacts is still being assessed, Hoevertsz said. Addressing them before haulers wrap up their work, utility companies install new underground lines to neighborhoods and new construction is well underway would be jumping the gun, he said. Federal emergency dollars may also be available to help with those repairs.

Budget shortfalls from the fires are not expected to affect the two years of general fund dollars the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors committed to spend on repaving projects just two weeks before the October firestorm, Rabbitt said. The shortfalls are projected at $2.2 million for the current fiscal year running through June, and $14.2 million for the year upcoming.

A final determination will be made at county budget hearings in June. However, Hoevertsz said he’s had no indication any of the scheduled $12.1 million from the general fund is in jeopardy.

Roads crews are otherwise getting prepared to spend down the guaranteed stream of new tax money on these deferred projects, if only for a single year while the law remains in place.

“Getting SB1 approved, it’s the difference of laying employees off or to not deliver as many projects as we’d like to in maintenance,” said Hoevertsz. Not having it would “mean more potholes and an inability to replace culverts. It’s huge, huge for maintenance and prevention programs, and for all the counties, not just Sonoma County.”

Show Comment