Tribune Media terminates sale to Sinclair Broadcast Group, seeks $1 billion in damages

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.


Sinclair Broadcast Group’s proposed $3.9-billion deal to acquire Tribune Media is dead.

Tribune announced Thursday that it is terminating the merger agreement. The companies had the option to kill the sale if it had not closed by Aug. 8. The deal was first announced in May 2017.

Tribune also said it filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit against Sinclair in Delaware Chancery Court, claiming the company failed to live up to its commitment to make its best effort at getting regulatory approval of the sale. Tribune is seeking $1 billion in damages.

“In light of the FCC’s unanimous decision, referring the issue of Sinclair’s conduct for a hearing before an administrative law judge, our merger cannot be completed within an acceptable timeframe, if ever,” Tribune Media Chief Executive Peter Kern said in a statement. “This uncertainty and delay would be detrimental to our company and our shareholders. Accordingly, we have exercised our right to terminate the merger agreement, and, by way of our lawsuit, intend to hold Sinclair accountable.”

The merger has been on hold since the Federal Communications Commission voted on July 19 to have the proposal reviewed by an administrative court, a process that has a history of killing such deals.

Sinclair’s plan to buy Tribune’s 42 TV stations — including Los Angeles outlet KTLA-TV Channel 5 — had been expected to benefit from President Trump’s appointment of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, who is considered a strong proponent of deregulation of the broadcast industry.

But Pai raised concerns about how Sinclair planned to divest some Tribune stations in order to meet the national cap on TV-station ownership. Under Sinclair’s plan, Tribune stations in Chicago, Dallas and Houston would have been sold to entities that had business ties to Sinclair for prices well under market value. The commission said Sinclair may have misrepresented its plans during the approval process.

Sinclair executives have maintained that they were transparent in their divestiture proposals.

But they may have been overconfident about the FCC approving the deal because of the company’s favorable news coverage of Trump. The company forces its local TV stations to air segments and commentaries supporting the Trump administration’s policies, and former Trump campaign adviser Boris Epshteyn is chief political analyst for Sinclair.

There has also been speculation that Sinclair would use the clout of its expanded national reach provided by the addition of Tribune to launch a conservative-leaning news service to compete with Fox News Channel.

Sinclair stated publicly that it wanted Tribune’s outlets in order to take advantage of emerging over-the-air broadcast technology. The coming improvements will allow stations to offer higher-quality signals to viewers watching on TV and send programming and other data directly to mobile devices, enabling them to deliver targeted advertising messages. While Sinclair is already the largest holder of TV stations, Tribune’s outlets would have given it coverage in Los Angeles and New York.

Tribune shareholders had been counting on getting $43.50 in a combination of cash and stock from Sinclair. Tribune stock closed at $33.64 a share on Wednesday. The stock was up in trading on Thursday.

Sinclair has yet to issue a comment on Tribune’s decision.

Left-leaning opponents of the merger said a larger Sinclair would have further spread pro-Trump views into local newscasts.

“The end of this proposed expansion is a huge victory for those who want local news to stay truly local, and especially those communities who were set to see Sinclair take over their airwaves,” said Media Matters fellow Pam Vogel said in a statement. “But Sinclair is still a major threat to the future of local news.”

But there were critics on the political right as well. Chris Ruddy, who heads the conservative TV and web service Newsmax, petitioned against the merger on the grounds that concentrated ownership “posed serious risks for diverse and balanced news in America’s heartland.”

The American Cable Assn., which represents small and medium-sized cable providers, said a larger Sinclair would have had too much clout in carriage-fee negotiations for its TV stations, eventually driving up prices for consumers.

“Tribune’s decision to pull the plug on the Sinclair merger is great news for consumers who will avoid paying the higher pay-TV rates the deal would have caused,” Matthew M. Polka, president and chief executive of the American Cable Association, said in a statement.

Show Comment

Our Network

Sonoma Index-Tribune
Petaluma Argus Courier
North Bay Business Journal
Sonoma Magazine
Bite Club Eats
La Prensa Sonoma
Emerald Report
Spirited Magazine