s
s
Sections
Search
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
X

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

Login

X

Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

LoginSubscribe

SACRAMENTO — Supporters of a November ballot measure to repeal a California gas tax increase proposed Tuesday an initiative for 2020, saying it would provide money for road repairs and eliminate the state's beleaguered $77 billion high-speed rail project.

The proposal comes from conservative radio host Carl DeMaio and others behind Proposition 6, which will ask voters this November if they want to repeal a 12-cent gas tax hike and increases in vehicle registration fees approved by lawmakers last year.

The 2020 plan is the next step in their effort. It would change the state Constitution to require revenue from existing gas taxes be spent only for road and bridge work, not transit, bicycle infrastructure or planning.

All other transportation-related revenue — such as taxes and fees on auto sales, insurance and vehicle registrations — would have to be spent on transit projects.

"The problem is not that Californians are not paying enough in taxes," DeMaio told reporters outside the state Capitol. "The problem is that the politicians are not spending the money we give them to fix our roads, to maintain our infrastructure."

A key criticism of November's Proposition 6 is that repealing the gas tax increase would eliminate funding for thousands of transportation projects without any money to replace it.

The new initiative would redirect money that goes into state and local general funds so that it must be spent on transportation.

"It's not a new idea," said Michael Quigley, executive director of the California Alliance for Jobs, which opposes DeMaio's initiatives. "It's an old Republican idea that the Legislature has previously rejected because of its impacts on health care, higher education and public safety funding."

California's Democratic-led Legislature passed the increase on fuel taxes and vehicle fees last year. It is expected to raise about $5 billion a year for highway and road improvements and transit programs.

The gas tax is currently 41.7 cents per gallon, among the highest in the nation. This week, Californians are paying an average of $3.66 a gallon for gas, 80 cents more than the national average, according to AAA.

Republicans and Democrats agree the state needs a transportation overhaul but disagree on how to pay for it.

A Democratic state lawmaker from Orange County was recalled last year over his support for the fuel tax increase.

Those who support the tax increase contend it's critical to maintain the state's infrastructure. Opponents say gasoline has become too expensive and the Legislature should find other funding sources to cover the state's transportation needs.

California's high-speed rail project has become politically fraught as costs spike and its end date moves further back.

Voters approved roughly $10 billion in bonds in 2008 to construct a high-speed train that would take passengers between Los Angeles and San Francisco in less than three hours. It was supposed to cost about $40 billion.

Now, the cost has ballooned to an expected $77 billion, with the completion date pushed back to 2033.

Construction is underway in the state's Central Valley agricultural heartland, but the high-speed rail authority does not have enough money to complete the first phase from Bakersfield to San Francisco. As of April, the project had between $20 and $28 billion in hand.

Its funding comes from the bonds, federal dollars and revenue from the state's cap-and-trade program that requires businesses to buy credits to emit greenhouse gases.

The proposed ballot measure would halt funding for high-speed rail, force the state to cease activities on it and use any unspent bond money to retire the debt. The federal money has already been spent. The initiative does not specify how the cap-and-trade money earmarked for rail would be redirected.

High-speed rail is California's largest single infrastructure project. Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown is a staunch supporter, while Republicans largely detest the project.

Some Democratic lawmakers have grown frustrated by the cost overruns and delays. Republican gubernatorial candidate John Cox says he would kill the project, while the Democratic candidate, Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, said he supports it but is concerned about its financing.

___

Associated Press writer Kathleen Ronayne contributed.

Show Comment