Close to Home: Sonoma County’s responsibility to divest from private prisons

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.


What goes around, comes around. Thirty-five years ago, photos of white police officers using bullwhips and dogs on black citizens of apartheid South Africa shocked the conscience of the world. Now the internment camps on our southern border shock the conscience of our nation and test our commitment to our founding ideals of liberty and justice for all.

Citizens of the world responded to the brutal tactics of the apartheid regime with a boycott and divestment campaign that brought the racist government to its knees and resulted in an end to the apartheid system.

Sonoma County played a small part in that campaign when, in 1985, the Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 to prohibit investment of county funds in companies operating in South Africa. A few months later, they followed this action with another 5-0 vote to prohibit procurement by the county of any product made in South Africa.

Now we have a proposal to stop funding internment camps for undocumented immigrants and asylum-seekers by disinvesting from companies with ties to those facilities.

In 1985, the county’s treasurer, Don Merz, at first made the same argument about divestment being made now by Treasurer Erick Roeser: that the requirements to safeguard the principal, maintain liquidity and maximize return on county funds prevented him from carrying out these steps. Upon closer inspection, it became clear that the county could continue to meet those requirements with more socially responsible investments.

There are so many options available to political entities that they can choose how to invest their money and still have security, liquidity and maximum return. This has actually become quite mainstream, and many entities choose to focus on more responsible use of the people’s money in ways that build community.

Yes, Supervisor Ernie Carpenter sponsored the anti-apartheid measures, and one would expect his support. But Supervisors Nick Esposti, Janet Nicholas and Jim Harberson were all registered Republicans, and Supervisor Helen Rudee certainly was no flaming radical. Merz came around, as did the Department of General Services. It was just the right thing to do.

We have choices. Let’s choose to support something better than squalid prison camps.

Elden McFarland of Healdsburg was a principal organizer of the effort to disinvest Sonoma County funds from South Africa in 1985.

You can send a letter to the editor at

Please read our commenting policy
  • No profanity, abuse, racism, hate speech or personal attacks on others.
  • No spam or off-topic posts. Keep the conversation to the theme of the article.
  • No disinformation about current events. Make sure facts are from a reliable source.
  • No name calling. "Orange Menace", "Libtards", etc. are not respectful.
Send a letter to the editor

Our Network

Sonoma Index-Tribune
Petaluma Argus Courier
North Bay Business Journal
Sonoma Magazine
Bite Club Eats
La Prensa Sonoma
Emerald Report
Spirited Magazine