Analysis: Fixing baseball requires radical change
In less than two weeks, baseball will have its first Washington All-Star Game since 1969, when the newly renamed Robert F. Kennedy Stadium hosted a contest in which Bob Gibson relieved Steve Carlton, in which Ernie Banks pinch-hit for Gibson, in which Roberto Clemente replaced Banks. Seventeen future Hall of Famers graced Washington’s ballpark for a rain-delayed mid-summer classic that featured the best the sport had to offer: Willie McCovey homering twice for the victorious National League, hometown hero Frank Howard countering once for the American League. That summer, though, was important for baseball for more fundamental reasons than an annual exhibition. When Carlton, then of St. Louis, and his counterpart Mel Stottlemyre of the New York Yankees toed RFK’s rubber to start the matchup, they did so on a mound that was just 10 inches above the playing surface, 5 inches lower than the previous summer.
If 1968 was the year of the pitcher - and it was, with Gibson’s modern-era record 1.12 ERA cast as the leading data point - 1969 showed that, faced with a crisis, baseball could adjust, and fundamentally so.
With the All-Star Game bringing baseball’s focus back to Washington in a way it hasn’t been in nearly half a century, it’s worth reflecting back if only because that’s what’s necessary to move forward. You’ll hear it in the run-up to and the coverage of the All-Star Game itself: Baseball is in crisis; it needs to fix itself. Being open to radical change must be part of the process.
The issue, right now, is elemental to the game. Hitters have long argued that the most difficult pursuit in all of sports is to hit a pitched baseball. Right now, it’s as if they’re trying to prove that en masse.
Their collective batting average through last weekend was .246 - which, if it ended the year as such, would be the lowest mark since 1972 and the second-lowest since that offensive wasteland of 1968.
We can talk all we want about the length of games, and baseball is wise to keep tabs on that aspect of its health. Through the weekend, nine-inning games averaged 2 hours, 59 minutes and 44 seconds. That’s long, for sure. But it’s also down nearly 51/2 minutes from a year ago.
You know what else is down? Attendance, to 28,052 per game, off by more than 6 percent from last year and would be the lowest average, should it hold, in 15 years.
There has to be a relationship, then, between how often hitters are able to put balls in play and how willing fans are to pay to watch them try.
Now, ticket-buying trends don’t show up in real time. They settle in. Maybe that makes the attendance number more alarming, because the seeds of such a drop-off must have been sown in previous seasons.
But the current reality reflects the trends that lead to waning interest. In 2018, baseball games average 16.75 hits between the two teams. That number didn’t strike me as particularly low. Frame it with the time-of-game data, and it sounds alarming: A baseball game features a hit once every 10 or 11 minutes.
Other stats you likely will hear in state-of-the game assessments as the All-Star Game approaches: Batters are striking out in 22.3 percent of their plate appearances, an all-time high. Fastball velocity averages 93.6 mph, down a tick from last summer’s record (since 2007, when PitchF/x began measuring stats in all parks) but right in line with the previous two years. And teams are now using 4.23 pitchers per game, according to Baseball-Reference.com, which would be a record should it hold up.
Put aside the specific numbers, and the conclusion is easy: Fresher, more specialized pitchers throw harder. That causes batters to swing and miss more often. That removes action from the game. The result: Through Monday’s games, major-league hitters have produced more strikeouts than hits - which would be a first, should it hold. And it will.
There are potential small-step solutions. Try establishing a minimum of, say, three hitters that a pitcher must face. This would, in theory, make left-handed relievers face some right-handed hitters, potentially increasing offense - particularly in the late innings, when flame-throwing relievers have particularly deadened the game.
But at a larger structural level, the right way to construct and coach a team to win a baseball game doesn’t marry with making an appealing product to watch.
The game and its teams are now run by bright people - people who could be running hedge funds or solving physics problems or exploring space. Instead, they have applied their analytical brains to the game.
I love baseball analytics. I recommend a Fangraphs.com membership to anyone who used to flip over baseball cards and study the fine print. Slicing and dicing numbers can be a joy.
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: