Sonoma County officials are considering a multi-year ban on new vacation rentals in unincorporated areas burned by the October wildfires in a bid to prevent the sites of destroyed homes from being purchased by people who don’t plan to live there.
The measure comes as a greater number of properties burned in the fires go up for sale, and as a short-term ban on new vacation rentals, first authorized by the Board of Supervisors in the weeks after the fires, is set to expire Feb. 3.
Most supervisors were unwilling this week to extend the temporary moratorium beyond that date, but the board directed staff members to develop plans for a longer-term prohibition of new vacation rentals in areas outside cities where hundreds of homes were lost more than three months ago.
Supervisor Susan Gorin, an ardent supporter of vacation rental restrictions after the fires, said she’s heard strong interest in such a ban from residents in her district, which includes the Sonoma Valley, a popular tourist destination. Her support stems in part from an acknowledgment that some owners of the more than 5,100 homes lost in the county won’t rebuild due to financial challenges or other difficulties.
“I could just see the handwriting on the walls: That as the for sale signs pop up, investors will scoop them up with the thought that they are going to build very large homes to be used as vacation rentals,” said Gorin, who lost her own home in the fires. “They know that, in the end, those areas will recover, so why not monetize the asset now? I want to make sure that we give absolute first priority to the families who lost homes.”
Gorin was the only supervisor who voted Tuesday against allowing the temporary moratorium to expire. The ban did not include the Sonoma Coast or the Russian River area. In an interview, Gorin said she thought the board’s move was premature, with many fire victims “still unsettled,” and that she would have agreed to extend the temporary ban for a full year, as allowed by state law.
Glen Ellen resident Ed Davis has urged supervisors to extend the moratorium once more, fearing a possible vacation rental “land rush” before the county can prohibit them in the burn zones for a few years.
“They’ve created a window that speculators are going to capitalize on,” said Davis, who’s helped find housing for members of his community who lost their homes in October. “They just need to pause so that, while these new regulations and modifications are considered, they haven’t left this crack in the system that speculators will flood through.”
But Diana Gorsiski, past president of the North Bay Association of Realtors, worried that putting too many restrictions on vacation rentals, even in the burned areas, could impede homeowners’ private property rights, though she stressed the organization hadn’t taken any position on the proposal discussed by supervisors.
“When we restrict homeowners with what they can do with their property, we don’t think that actually helps the housing situation,” said Gorsiski, a local real estate agent. “I can tell you firsthand: People buying in these areas are people who just want to build a home. Nobody’s talked about it being a vacation rental home. That’s not on anybody’s mind at the moment.”