s
s
Sections
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?
iPhone

I have discovered why NFL teams have not signed Colin Kaepernick.

They don’t have to.

For months, advocates have been demanding that someone hire the former 49ers quarterback — whether they want to or not.

So far, the answer has been not. These NFL guys are remarkably resistant to being told which players they should put on their roster.

(Personally, I think Joe Montana has it right when he says teams doubt Kaepernick’s ability to play the position. More on that in a minute.)

But first, a few points. Just to repeat: If the NFL is blackballing Kaepernick for his politics, it has set a new low for hypocrisy. The league continues to employ players who have been involved in awful stuff. You know the list: domestic abuse, assault and drug use.

Kneeling for the national anthem isn’t in the same universe. Wearing socks portraying cops as pigs is definitely going to hack some people off (and I’d say does more to harm his message than help) but taking a stand against racial violence should not disturb the NFL.

And it hasn’t. Kaepernick didn’t tear the 49ers asunder. When kneel-gate broke, team ownership and management — in an unexpected flash of common sense — said that was Kaepernick’s free speech right. Other players joined the protest, knelt for the anthem and there were no recriminations. Head coach Chip Kelly said he was not a distraction.

And, at the end of the year the players voted him the Len Eshmont Award for the player who best “exemplifies … inspirational and courageous play.”

What hasn’t happened is a team stepping up and hiring Kaepernick for his football skills. Instead there’s been a slow slide in expectations. Clearly he’s no longer seen as a starter. Otherwise he’d have been signed long ago.

Kaepernick supporters tout stats like touchdown/interception ratio to show that he should be playing. But nobody crunches numbers like the NFL and the data is not inspiring.

Stat-driven football analytics sites — from Fox Sports to ESPN to Pro Football Focus — don’t have Kaepernick ranked among the top 20 quarterbacks. Pro Football Focus, for example, says his passer rating from a “clean pocket” ranked 29th.

Of course we could talk stats until our calculators burst into flame. Everybody has different numbers.

But in the NFL, they want a quarterback who can move the needle. After the 49ers started 1-4 last year, Kaepernick took over the starting job.

He went 1-10 the rest of the way.

On a bad team, you say. And that’s true.

But who do you think he’s going to end up with if he signs? The Patriots? Best guess is he goes to a team that’s struggling and hoping for a spark. Winning one out of 11 isn’t very sparky.

New 49ers head coach and quarterback whisperer Kyle Shanahan passed on Kaepernick. In interviews he’s said that he doesn’t want to tailor an offense to specific needs. Kaepernick’s greatest success came with the Jim Harbaugh team — powerful defense, consistent running game.

That’s not Shanahan’s style. That sounds like what Montana meant in an interview last week when he said he thought the lack of interest “comes down to his play as much as anything.”

Now, is it possible Kaepernick could sign on with a team and suddenly blossom into a top quarterback? Sure. But this is where the political baggage does come into play.

If we accept that the offensive brains in the NFL have reservations about how good Kaepernick is — and I think that’s fair — the potential public fuss is only going to create more second thoughts.

First, upon signing him, even as a backup, there will be a media meltdown. Definitely a formal press conference with national coverage.

But then what happens if you decide the fourth-round kid you took a chance on is better than expected? He’s not only doing most of what Kaepernick is doing, he’s younger and — maybe more importantly — he’s cheaper.

So you cut Kaepernick and keep the kid.

Do you face angry demonstrations from advocates who insist that he stay on the roster?

Or, halfway through the season, what if Kaepernick supporters demand to know why he isn’t the starter? Is it because of his political activism?

In fact, 49ers general manager John Lynch has said he told Kaepernick, in so many words, that he should tone it down a little because there’s “a perception that football is not at the top of his list.”

It is not advice that Kaepernick has taken. On the Fourth of July he traveled to Ghana and tweeted “How can we truly celebrate independence on a day that intentionally robbed our ancestors of theirs?”

OK, so he’s showing the courage of convictions.

But suppose you are one of many candidates for a job, and someone told you it would help your chances if you didn’t go all political and controversial.

Instead, you continue to push your agenda.

That says two things. First, good for you — you don’t back down.

And second, you don’t really want the job.

Contact C.W. Nevius at cw.nevius@pressdemocrat.com. Twitter: @cwnevius.

Show Comment