Biden ‘surprised’ to learn classified documents were found in private office

President Biden said Tuesday he does not know what information they contain.|

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden said Tuesday he was “surprised” to learn in November that his lawyers found classified government documents in his former office at a think tank in Washington, and he said he does not know what information they contain.

Biden spoke a day after the White House acknowledged that his lawyers had discovered a small cache of Obama-era documents as they packed up his former office at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement.

The revelation created a political headache for Biden, who has called former President Donald Trump irresponsible for hoarding sensitive documents at his private club and residence in Florida, and a tactical opportunity for Republicans who had been badly divided in the aftermath of the 2022 midterm elections.

The White House has stressed that the circumstances are different — that Biden had neither been notified that he had official records nor been asked to return them, and his team promptly revealed the discovery to the National Archives and returned them within a day.

Biden on Tuesday said he takes “classified documents seriously” and that his team had immediately contacted the archives to turn over the materials. “We’re cooperating fully — cooperating fully — with the review,” he said.

He also distanced himself from the matter, suggesting that someone else had brought the files there without his knowledge.

“After I was briefed about the discovery, I was surprised to learn that there are any government records that were taken to that office,” he said at news conference in Mexico, where he appeared with Andrés Manuel López Obrador, president of Mexico, and Justin Trudeau, the Canadian prime minister.

“But I don’t know what’s in the documents,” Biden said.

The Justice Department is reviewing the discovery to determine how to proceed. According to two people familiar with the matter, the inquiry is aimed at helping Attorney General Merrick Garland decide whether to appoint a special counsel, like the one investigating Trump’s failure to return all of the sensitive documents he kept at Mar-a-Lago.

Garland has been briefed on the inquiry, according to a person familiar with the situation, though it is not clear if he has made a decision.

The classified documents included briefing materials on foreign countries from his time as vice president, two people familiar with the situation said Tuesday. They asked for anonymity to discuss sensitive information.

The documents were found on Nov. 2, and the National Archives retrieved them the next morning. The White House waited to publicly acknowledge the matter on Monday, in response to a CBS News report revealing what had happened.

The discovery of the documents came a week before the midterm congressional elections, when the news would have been a high-profile, last-minute development.

Ian Sams, a White House spokesperson, said that the Biden team was being circumspect about its public discussion of the matter because the Justice Department is examining it.

“This is an ongoing process under review by DOJ, so we are going to be limited in what we can say at this time,” he said. “But we are committed to doing this the right way, and we will provide further details when and as appropriate.”

As the president met with officials from Mexico and Canada to discuss trade and immigration, the newly installed House Republican majority in Washington seized on the story to kick off what is expected to be two years of relentless investigations of the Biden administration, with a far-reaching request by the Oversight Committee to the National Archives for correspondence among the archives, the Justice Department and top Biden aides.

The committee’s new chairman, Rep. James R. Comer, R-Ky., said the government had moved aggressively against Trump for his possession of classified documents, but not Biden, who he said had “repeatedly kept classified materials in an insecure location for years” but “never faced a raid.”

“Meanwhile, the FBI conducted a raid on former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence for the same violation,” Comer said.

The circumstances of the two cases are starkly different, however. Unlike Trump, who resisted months of government requests to return the material stored at Mar-a-Lago and failed to fully comply with a subpoena, for which a judge is weighing holding his team in contempt, Biden’s team appears to have acted swiftly and in accordance with the law, immediately summoning officials with the National Archives to retrieve the files. The archives then alerted the Justice Department, according to the White House.

The episode illustrated Biden’s difficulty extracting himself from political peril, even when buoyed by events like the Democrats’ unexpectedly strong showing in the 2022 midterm elections. Republicans, eager to move on from the rancor of their recent House leadership fight, hope to spin the Biden documents case into an attack that sustains a protracted congressional investigation that damages Biden and blunts the impact of Trump’s troubles on the party.

Garland, whose time in office has been defined by his department’s investigations of Trump’s role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and the documents case, assigned the preliminary phase of the inquiry to John R. Lausch Jr., the U.S. attorney in Chicago. The pick was intended to blunt criticism that Garland was seeking to protect the Democratic president who appointed him.

Biden’s lawyers said they found the documents in a locked closet, intermingled with personal papers as they were packing up boxes from the office.

Biden and his aides had used the office from mid-2017 until the start of the 2020 presidential campaign, and the lawyers were preparing to vacate the space, the White House has said. The discovery was not in response to any prior request from the archives, and there was no indication that Biden or his team resisted efforts to recover any sensitive documents.

When Biden’s lawyers discovered the documents, they immediately cleared the room and stopped looking at the files, according to a person briefed on their account of the incident. As a result, the Biden team does not know how many classified documents had been in the closet and what all of their contents were, according to the person, who asked for anonymity to discuss sensitive information.

The National Archives was required to notify the Justice Department that classified material had been discovered in an unauthorized place, as it did in January 2022 when it found 184 files marked as classified in 15 boxes of materials it retrieved from Mar-a-Lago.

In that matter, the Justice Department eventually developed evidence that Trump was still holding on to numerous other classified materials. It obtained a grand jury subpoena in May, leading his team to provide 38 additional such documents, at which time they falsely said that was all there were.

After obtaining further evidence that Trump was still withholding documents, the FBI obtained a judicial warrant to search Mar-a-Lago and found 103 more, along with thousands of other publicly owned but unclassified documents and photographs. A federal judge is weighing whether to hold Trump’s team in contempt for defying the May subpoena.

Garland then assigned Lausch, a Trump appointee, to conduct a so-called initial investigation aimed at gathering facts and legal research to inform whether it would be appropriate to appoint a special counsel.

Biden said that his aides had cooperated fully with the National Archives after informing them of what had been found.

He said his lawyers had advised him not to even ask what was in the files, and said he hoped the inquiry “will be finished soon.”

UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy:
  • This is a family newspaper, please use a kind and respectful tone.
  • No profanity, hate speech or personal attacks. No off-topic remarks.
  • No disinformation about current events.
  • We will remove any comments — or commenters — that do not follow this commenting policy.