Better communication sought from PG&E after first planned power shutdown in Sonoma County
When the power went out at 4:30 a.m. Wednesday northeast of Santa Rosa, part of a planned shut-off by PG&E to stave off the threat of wildfire, George Jackson wandered outside of his Franz Valley house and noticed something strange.
“There was no wind,” Jackson said.
But the hot and dry conditions early this past week across Northern California raised enough alarm with fire, weather and utility authorities that PG&E, the region's dominant power supplier, scrambled to warn residents of the likelihood that their electricity would be shut off.
The first such warning came the evening of Sept. 21, a Friday, and by Tuesday, potential shutdowns were predicted to impact as many as 34,000 PG&E customers across a region scarred in the past two years by massive, deadly wildfires, the majority of them linked by state investigators to the utility's power equipment.
Cutting off electricity has become an increasingly significant and controversial part of the bankrupt utility's bid to reduce its risk of causing another calamity and limit its own soaring liabilities, estimated at more than $30 billion for the 2017 and 2018 fires.
But Jackson was sure he heard that the forecast for winds was set to factor into any shut-off decision, with an eye out for the kind of winds - measured at up to 68 mph - that helped supercharge the Tubbs fire as it screamed downhill into Santa Rosa two years ago from Napa County.
The lack of wind - top gusts reached 16 mph on Wednesday amid the North Bay shut-off - coupled with the relative whiplash of warnings that left residents and local emergency officials in suspense for days, sowed confusion and anger among residents and the local officials charged with public safety here.
“I'm very frustrated at how much staff hours and money we spent to run around and chase PG&E's potential forecasting,” said Sonoma County Supervisor James Gore, whose north county district was affected by the Wednesday shutdown. “I've never seen so much money used in our county to chase a weather forecast.”
Windy weather conditions
In fact, winds of at least 25 mph are among the criteria used by PG&E officials to determine whether to shut down power.
At 4:30 a.m. Wednesday, when power was turned off to roughly 1,400 customers in Sonoma and Napa counties, Jackson was right, there was no wind, according to the National Weather Service. Winds peaked later that day with 16 mph gusts at about 2 p.m. By that time, however, efforts were underway to restore power. By 11:30 p.m. Wednesday, more than 90% of customers had electricity restored, with Sonoma County customers restored by 4 p.m. In all, 48,200 customers were impacted in the Sierra Nevada foothills and the North Bay.
PG&E spokeswoman Deanna Contreras said wind is just one of a variety of factors the utility weighs when deciding to pull the plug. She also promised better communication in future shutdown situations.
Sonoma County Emergency Manager Chris Godley didn't second-guess the shutdown, saying PG&E is responsible for determining whether the weather poses a threat to its infrastructure or risks starting a wildfire. He said he has seen forecasts swing the other way, ushering in more dangerous conditions - something he said makes him err on the side of caution.
“That's absolutely our job in public safety,” Godley said. “We cannot forecast the future, especially the weather. We have to make sure we're built for, essentially, the worst-case scenario every time.”
Gore, likewise, didn't begrudge the shutdown, saying he was more concerned about what he called communications failures that he blamed on PG&E. Gore said it's been a problem for months, and he said updates from the utility were vague in the 60 hours before power was finally cut.
PG&E promised to make a decision at numerous points, backing off each time and putting off the decision until later.
“We took our biggest black eye about the fires with our alert warning system,” Gore said, referencing the county's failures to issue more widespread warnings through its emergency alert system amid the deadly October 2017 fires. “We turned that on its head by doing more testing than anybody. I want to see the same level of commitment … that same level of urgency and transparency (from PG&E).”
Contreras, the PG&E spokeswoman, said the company was aware of communications problems and said via email that PG&E is committed to improving its coordination with local authorities during public safety power shutdowns. Contreras said a series of meetings are planned with emergency management officials in Sonoma, Butte, Nevada, Yuba, Placer and Plumas counties.
UPDATED: Please read and follow our commenting policy: