Mexican government rejects more aggressive fight against coronavirus
Resisting calls to amp up the fight against the coronavirus, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador and his top aides continued to defend a strategy they say balances public health needs with potential damage to the country's faltering economy.
"We don't want to have a cure that is costlier in social terms than the actual illness," Hugo López-Gatell, the country's sub-secretary of health, told reporters Thursday. "We have said many times that there are some measures that don't have a technical basis, such as closing borders and airports."
Mexico has taken some measures, such as extending schools' Holy Week break, urging people to work from home and encouraging social distancing — widely disseminating a cartoon character called Susana Distancia, which means "your safe distance."
Some states and cities have mandated additional measures. Mexico City has ordered bars, gyms, churches and museums closed, and banned gatherings of more than 50 people, but restaurants and other shops remain open and some street life continues.
López Obrador has been hesitant to impose stay-at-home orders, curfews or other more severe restrictions. He has called on Mexican families to monitor the health of elderly loved ones.
The president's restrained approach has earned him blistering criticism from independent public health experts and an accusation Thursday from New York-based Human Rights Watch that he is "putting the people of Mexico in grave danger."
"President López Obrador's behavior in the face of the COVID-19 crisis is a profoundly dangerous example that threatens Mexicans' health," said José Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch, who has been a frequent critic of the Mexican president.
As of Thursday night, Mexico had confirmed at least 585 coronavirus infections and eight deaths. Those figures are lower than in Brazil and Chile, but experts suspect they are incomplete.
"We're seeing a sample of patients who have symptoms and have shown up in hospitals," said Eduardo González-Pier, a former public health official who now works in the private sector. "We don't have a clear picture of the population that has been exposed and has not presented symptoms. ... Nobody really knows how many cases are out there."
Based on how the virus spread in China, Mexican health officials estimated last week that as many as 250,656 Mexicans could contract it, with 10,528 requiring intensive care in the hospital. They did not release estimates of how many of those would die.
Government officials say that they are prepared to impose more drastic measures if needed, but that they will do everything necessary to avoid increasing the economic stress on the poor. About half the Mexican population has no savings, said López-Gatell, the government's point person on the crisis.
"One cannot severely restrict social and economic activity," he said. "It would cause a possibly irreparable damage for a great quantity of families who live day-to-day, small merchants, independent professionals, small businesses, domestic workers — for instance, street vendors."
Despite intense criticism from independent medical professionals, many Mexicans support the government's current approach, hoping to avoid a repeat of 2009, when the swine flu outbreak prompted a weeklong shutdown of the capital, severely disrupting economic and social activity.
"If I don't work, I can't bring money home to feed my kids," said Martín Salgado, 34, a father of two who works at a parking lot in downtown Mexico City. "I get it — don't shake hands, keep a personal distance, wear a mask — but there's no need to shut everything down. How would we survive?"