The ghost of the proposed Highway 12 freeway along the southern edge of east Santa Rosa has risen from the grave where it has languished for 52 years.
The good news is that it is not (as one editorial writer put it in the 1990s) "the bony-fingered specter of a bridge over Spring Lake." Today, it is more like a cheery wave beckoning citizens toward a rosy future.
Bridge fears are no longer issues, but there is no question that something is afoot along the 300-foot-wide, two-mile swath of open land that stretches from the end of Farmers Lane to Summerfield Road. And it's definitely not a freeway.
It could be a park, a pedestrian walkway, a bikeway, some cluster housing, small family farms, a heritage orchard, a sculpture garden, or all of the aforementioned.
But don't hold your breath.
The state still owns the property. And a request from the city and the Sonoma County Transportation Authority for a project study report is said to be "in the queue at Caltrans." In Sacramentospeak that could mean something like "dead in the water."
Described as "a legacy project" by Thea Hensel, who, with Linda Proulx, heads what is now known as the Southeast Greenway Committee, this is a plan for what could, might, maybe, possibly happen down the road (you should pardon
Although discussions have been going on for five years, the campaign has "flown under the radar here," as Proulx terms it. It is funded under the nonprofit umbrella of the Leadership Institute for Ecology and Economy and has attracted some important academic attention. Professor Michael Southworth, from UC Berkeley's Urban Design Studio, assigned the greenway as a semester project for 10 of his master's-degree candidates.
The eight plans the students devised were presented to a standing-room crowd of interested citizens at the Glaser Center last month.
There was a wide range of ideas — as one viewer suggested, "a lot of bits and pieces to put together." And, throughout, tempering the enthusiasm, was the message that the project is "the really long view," and an optimistic one, considering that, as we have said, Caltrans still owns the land.
A little history is in order here.
It must have seemed like a great idea at the time — routing Highway12, as a freeway, along the southern edge of eastern Santa Rosa to take traffic off the city streets.
But that was 1959. And it didn't happen.
Then, of course, there was the matter of the opposition to the Spring Lake Bridge.
Proponents of the freeway argued, correctly, that the highway right of way had come first. And when the county dammed Santa Rosa Creek for flood-control purposes in the 1960s and created a 100-acre lake, surrounded by a 400-acre park, the right of way wasn't considered a problem. Caltrans promised to build a bridge and that seemed just fine with local officials.
But there were several factors in play that would change attitudes toward that bridge dramatically. The first one was the overwhelming success of Spring Lake Park, which drew 35,000 paying visitors in its first three months — and that was only for the automobiles that drove in. It didn't count people who came by foot, bike or horse, or parked outside the entrance. Most of these became "regulars" who jogged, walked, biked and dearly loved the natural beauty and the accessibility. (Today the park draws more than 700,000 visits per year.)