We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.



Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.


Among the components of incinerated households that could pose pollution risks are:

- treated wood (copper, chromium arsenic)

- consumer electronics (lead, mercury, cadmium)

- older shingles (asbestos)

- galvanized nails (zinc)

- ash (arsenic, antimony, lead, copper, chromium)


Read all of the PD's fire coverage here

Anyone who endured the October firestorms remembers the choking smoke followed by weeks of air that was acrid and irritating, while the surrounding world felt toxic after wildfires laid waste to 137 square miles of Sonoma County.

A research team from UC Davis now hopes to find out what, if any, potential health hazards may have resulted from the incineration of more than 5,100 homes and all they contained: cleaning products, paints, pesticides, electronics packed with rare earth elements, synthetic building materials, fuels.

The two-year investigation will focus on components in the smoke as the fires burned, as well as those left in the air and ash once the flames had roared through.

Researchers also plan to test the post-fire environment for any new chemicals that may have resulted from the transformation of existing materials under extremely high-temperature, low-oxygen conditions.

The project is aimed, in part, at understanding the array of substances residents may have been exposed to by breathing or sifting through the remains of neighborhoods afterward, as well as the potential health implications.

It also is intended to inform the environmental health response to future wildfires expected to proliferate in the urban-wildland interface as the climate shifts, researchers said.

In addition, online surveys and field interviews will be used to try to assess short- and long-term health impacts among residents exposed to smoke in Sonoma County and neighboring areas.

“We want to paint a picture of not only what happened in the moment, but also what’s happening now, with the cleanup and re-entry and the different phases as they unfold,” said Keith Bein, a scientist with the UC Davis Air Quality Research Center. “Because this is unprecedented. We don’t know what to expect.”

Led by Irva Hertz-Picciotto, an epidemiologist and director of the UC Davis Environmental Health Sciences Center, the multidisciplinary study is driven by recognition of how little is known about fires on the scale of those in the North Bay three months ago.

The contents of smoke from a wildland fire — where mainly organic matter burns — are better known, though there’s a push for more research there as well, given increased use of flame retardant and pesticides on forests and wild places, according to a separate UC Davis study.

But when a community burns, “there may be different kinds of health effects simply because the mix of chemicals is probably quite different,” Hertz-Picciotto said.

Among the involved researchers is doctoral student Gabby Black, a Sonoma native whose family still resides in the area and was evacuated during the first days of the inferno.

After watching helplessly from afar for several weeks, Black was back in Sonoma County around Halloween collecting samples of ash from inside the foundations of homes along the path of the Tubbs fire — Franz Valley Road, Larkfield/Wikiup, Coffey Park, Mark West and elsewhere — in each case scooping from areas that seemed to be the kitchen or garage.

She also took background samples of burned biomass from Robert Louis Stevenson State Park in Napa County for comparison.

The samples haven’t been analyzed yet, but the focus is on materials forged in the fire through synthesis, as well as those that survived the flames without breaking down into constituent substances, she said.

Bein already has stored samples of particulate matter filtered from the smoke that poured out of Sonoma during the fires.

He began collecting them the first night in his hometown of Oakland, as well as at Davis during the first days the North Bay burned.

He and his colleagues also plan continuous, 24-hour air sampling in Sonoma and Napa counties over the long term, capturing samples from places with a range of recovery and rebuilding activity.

His team is building a mobile air-monitoring unit for deployment once the wettest part of winter has passed that’s powered by the batteries in two all-electric vehicles so they can operate in areas without power.

Bein already surmises that tiny particles of ash will persist in the fire zone for years and potentially become airborne in dry conditions.

Particles small enough to get past human defense systems and penetrate deep into the lungs could spell trouble.

“That’s where the toxicity really happens,” he said.

Researchers also are hoping for the participation of thousands of residents from Sonoma County and neighboring areas exposed to smoke on an online survey that will go live as soon as it’s approved by a board that supervises studies on human subjects, Hertz-Picciotto said.

Framed in part through input from Sonoma and Napa county public health officials, the Centers for Disease Control and others, the survey will include questions about individual experiences during the fires, subsequent access to power and water, mental or physical health symptoms experienced and a host of other topics that may correlate with short- or long-term health implications as well as future disaster response needs.

Residents can register to take the survey at ehscc.ucdavis.edu/community/norcalfire-health/

The research team also plans randomized field surveys of a far smaller sample size to be conducted later in person.

Hertz-Picciotto said people exposed to the fires, especially those in otherwise good health, may have nothing to worry about. The study is largely intended to determine if that’s the case.

“I don’t think we’re presuming one way or another on this,” she said. “I think we want to collect really good, strong, objective data.”

But Bein thinks it likely there are some health implications to be reckoned with.

“Air pollution in general, minus any horrific fire events like this, poses a health risk,” he said. “We already know that. So there’s always this background pollution going on, but these activities — the wildfires and the things that happen after — are going to increase that, and they’re going to add not only to the amount in the air, but actually the composition of it.”

You can reach Staff Writer Mary Callahan at 707-521-5249 or mary.callahan@pressdemocrat.com.

Show Comment