s
s
Sections
Search
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
X

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

Login

X

Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

LoginSubscribe

We write a lot about seeking common ground and compromising for the common good. So it’s incumbent on us to take note when government officials do just that.

In this instance, we’re referring to Santa Rosa and Sonoma County leaders who, without much fanfare, pushed aside a stubborn obstacle to settling Roseland’s future.

While many of us were focused on the election, the city and county settled on a cost-sharing plan to break the fiscal logjam that has long prevented Santa Rosa from annexing Roseland, an urban unincorporated area barely distinguishable from the city that has grown around it. (The agreement also clears the way to annex four county islands in the southwest Santa Rosa area.)

“This is an important milestone,” said outgoing Supervisor Efren Carrillo, who grew up in Roseland and has represented the heavily Latino neighborhood for almost eight years.

Santa Rosa Mayor John Sawyer concurred. “We were able to work out an agreement that fit for both the county and city in the long term,” he told Staff Writer Kevin McCallum.

The cost-sharing agreement announced on Oct. 26, and approved Nov. 1 by the Board of Supervisors, isn’t the final step in the annexation process. It goes to the City Council later this month. After that, approval is needed from an obscure county commission and, eventually, annexation must be affirmed by residents of Roseland and the other islands.

But it is finances rather than a lack of public support that has bogged down annexation efforts stretching back 20 years and more.

The city will need to provide police, fire protection and other public services to the approximately 7,000 residents of Roseland. Roads, sidewalks and other public infrastructure in the 714-acre annexation area must be brought up to city standards. And those improvements must be made without reducing services or lowering standards for the other 175,000 residents of Santa Rosa. To accomplish all of that, the city asked for more than $30 million from the county.

The supervisors favor annexation, but they must maintain services for residents of unincorporated areas and offered about $13 million.

Under the compromise plan, the county will make a one-time $790,000 payment to help with startup costs for city services and to assess storm water systems in the annexation area; $500,000 per year for 10 years to help offset a $3.6 million annual increase in city operating costs; and $660,000 per year for 10 years to help upgrade streets in Roseland.

In a major concession, the county agreed to a permanent annual payment to offset longterm costs. It begins at $226,400 a year and will be adjusted annually based on the property tax base of the Roseland school district. The city, meanwhile, accepted a longer timetable for upgrading services and infrastructure in Roseland.

This wasn’t a simple compromise for either side, nor did it come easily. An editorial on this page in 1999 said: “The problems of Roseland won’t be solved over night. Pulling together the finances could take 20 years.” Just six months ago, City Councilman Gary Wysocky lamented that the gap between the city and county was as wide as the Grand Canyon.

Today, the chasm has been bridged, and for Santa Rosa and Sonoma County, there’s finally a clear path to achieving a longtime goal.

Show Comment