s
s
Sections
Search
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, nearly 1.5 million people used their mobile devices to visit our sites.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Wow! You read a lot!
Reading enhances confidence, empathy, decision-making, and overall life satisfaction. Keep it up! Subscribe.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
Until next month, you can always look over someone's shoulder at the coffee shop.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
We don't just cover the North Bay. We live here.
Did You Know? In the first 10 days of the North Bay fire, we posted 390 stories about the fire. And they were shared nearly 137,000 times.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Supporting the community that supports us.
Obviously you value quality local journalism. Thank you.
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
Oops, you're out of free articles.
We miss you already! (Subscriptions start at just 99 cents.)
Already a subscriber?
iPhone
X

The "Follow This Story" feature will notify you when any articles related to this story are posted.

When you follow a story, the next time a related article is published — it could be days, weeks or months — you'll receive an email informing you of the update.

If you no longer want to follow a story, click the "Unfollow" link on that story. There's also an "Unfollow" link in every email notification we send you.

This tool is available only to subscribers; please make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

Login

X

Please note: This feature is available only to subscribers; make sure you're logged in if you want to follow a story.

LoginSubscribe

No easy solutions

EDITOR: I have noticed a rash of letters recently accusing us, as a community, of ignoring the plight of the homeless. Gail Outlaw says that “we can’t or won’t come up with a plan for low-cost housing” and suggests we find a “space where they can put their tents” (“Cruel treatment,” Sept. 25).

What she and her compadres don’t include in their letters is a way to fund living space for the poor and unhoused. Who should pay for this vacant lot where the homeless might camp?

There is a finite amount of money in any budget. Some is earmarked for road maintenance, but we can’t even afford to have all the potholes fixed, much less entire roads repaved. Cities have trouble keeping police and firefighters because we can’t pay them as much as other communities. Parks are short staffed and can’t even hire enough minimum-wage employees to keep toilet paper in the stalls.

It’s not that we are heartless or, worse, evil. No instant solution to this problem exists. It will take much cooperation between government, private and faith-based charities and the general public to come up with a viable plan.

PATRECIA GRAHAM

Petaluma

Betraying a public trust

EDITOR: Everyone we know loves Point Reyes National Seashore with the park’s iconic Tule elk. They were brought back from near extinction, beginning in 1962 when they were placed in protected status once Point Reyes National Seashore was established. Having lived in both Marin and Sonoma counties for more than 45 years, my husband and I are frequent visitors to Point Reyes because of its great beauty, diversity and wildlife.

We are shocked to learn that Rep. Jared Huffman has joined forces with Utah’s Republican Rep. Rob Bishop to co-sponsor House Resolution 6687, which leapfrogs over a National Park Service scoping process with public input for Point Reyes and thus ensures ranchers’ leases for 20 years (“Bill aims to preserve ranches at Point Reyes,” Sept. 29).

H.R. 6687 cuts into the democratic process of decision- making while opening the way for the possibility of legislation in favor of leaseholders in other national parks without public input and scrutiny. Finally, what happens to Tule elk and land/water protections for Point Reyes as a result of H.R. 6687?

Park preservation, not exploitation of lands and resources, has been the intent of our national parks. H.R. 6687 is a betrayal of public trust here in California.

CHRISTINE COHEN

Petaluma

Yes on M

EDITOR: At long last the environmental impact report is complete, and Tolay Regional Park will open later this year. Soon, the Petaluma City Council will review a plan to add 44 acres and a new southern entrance to Helen Putnam Regional Park.

These are exciting developments for hikers, cyclists, equestrians, runners, school groups, picnickers, photographers and just plain walkers who enjoy these south county recreational gems.

While county parks attract 5 million visitors a year, our Regional Parks Department lacks the necessary funds to clear new trails, install restrooms, increase support for educational programs and provide many other amenities that will make all of our parks fully accessible, safe and enjoyable.

Measure M would generate $11.5 million each year, exclusively for park maintenance and development. Measure M would add one-eighth of a cent to the sales tax, or 3 cents on a $25 purchase. Two-thirds of these funds would be used for the 56 county parks.

The remaining third would be divided among the cities to supplement depleted parks budgets, improve playgrounds, repair tennis courts, restore paths, build sports fields and revitalize local parks.

Most importantly, Measure M funds can be put to work clearing dead trees and dry fuel in many parks.

Vote yes on Measure M, a small price to pay for parks for all.

ANDREW EBER

Petaluma

Hoping Trump is right

EDITOR: Donald Trump says: “It’s a very scary time for young men in America.”

I hope he’s right.

Tell young men that drunkenness doesn’t excuse sexual predation or anything else. Tell young men that sexual predation is always wrong. Tell young men they should always ask to make absolutely certain their advances are welcomed. Tell young men “no” means no.

If they listen, there’s nothing to worry about.

LISE MELIN

Santa Rosa

The cost of Prop 6

EDITOR: It occurs to me that whenever a new tax is proposed, people react with great concern that it is going to cost them a tremendous amount of money. Regarding the gas tax, please consider that if you drive 12,000 miles a year, and get 20 miles per gallon, you will use 600 gallons of gas per year. At 12 cents per gallon, this comes to $72 per year, or $6 per month. If you get 30 miles per gallon, it amounts to $4 per month.

This may or may not change your mind about how to vote on Proposition 6, but at least now you know how much it’s going to cost you.

To me, this small amount of money seems like a reasonable price to pay to improve our streets, roads and highways.

BOB SPURGEON

Petaluma

You can send a letter to the editor at letters@pressdemocrat.com

Show Comment